Do you find it appalling that the rights of the accused seem to supersede the rights of the victim?
I am speaking about the illegal immigrant that raped and killed a infantile girl..The U.S. has only one option..deport him support to Mexico where he will be detained for a short period of time then released to sneak backbone into our country to do only God knows what.
Best Answer:
.Mayber not always.
well, they are innocent until proven guilty
If that were the defence, I suspect most would be appalled, yes. But I find when people make this spurious claim, it involves 'rights' which do not exist, such as a right to 'revenge', or a right to 'closure' The rights of everyone are equal, as long as they do not trample on the rights of others.
Yes and that is to say the way it has always be hate to say.
The object is not on trial. Before the government can take away someone's life or choice, they must be held to a burden of proof. If this looks like coddling the accused, too bad. The alternative is far worse.-
Anyone can be accuse, that's the problem.
Need more details, you can't make a blanket ruling on that.
If we didn't have individuals who accused citizens of crimes they didn't commit I would answer yes to your question. If you know of a better way than what we have to determine someones guilt than I would resembling to hear it.
