Do Peta activists choose their victims to avoid bodily harm?

Why is it that you only hear about animal rights activists throwing paint on old ladies fur coat, but you never hear of the same activists throwing paint on a bikers leather jacket?
probably too dump to know leather is made from animal hide...
Yes, I think that they do chose people who are less likely to hurt them.


Answers:
This is such a good point. I'm gonna say because they are spineless weassles like we all know they are. Also, most people believe in the philosophy that if you are going to kill an animal, you should use every part that you can. So, these little moron PETA people throw paint on the skins to ruin them? Now, that person takes PETA and it's little lemming to court and PETA then has to pay for a new coat... thus supporting the very industry they want to 'shut down'.
Survival instincts.
i wouldn't call Michael Vick a punk
It wouldn't surprise me.
I am sure they do pick who they abuse.

Peta should be labeled as a gang or terrorist orginization, in my opinion. Throwing paint on someone is illegal. Tresspassing is illegal. Things like that.
I wasn't aware that PETA was throwing paint on people at all. I thought that was more of a 'crazy renegade animal rights activist' thing to do.

But whatever the case, the answer is obviously 'yes.' And While you and I can find fault in the activity, I have to say I completely understand not getting in the face of someone who is likely to retaliate with violence.

(Of course, throwing paint on someone IS ALSO an act of violence. I think you and I agree on that.)

Now, just for the record: I do want to point out that as long as vegan college girls do those nude and semi-nude protests, you'll never get me to talk too bad about PETA.