Gun control and pit bulls?


I saw another question on here regarding gun control laws and I feel one of the answerers brought up a valid point "Yet, there are way too many stupid relatives out there who are extremely careless and for that reason I ruminate we need gun control. It sucks that a few stupid ones ruin it for everyone, but there's no other way around it." I've seen alot of that sentiment contained by and around the gun control argument on here and am curious to see how people's opinions on gun control relate to their opinions on the pit bull bans going on around the nation because I've see alot of the same argument from people for them as I've seen from empire for gun control and alot of the same arguments against the pit bull ban that I've seen against gun control. So are you for the pit bull debar or against? Are you for or against gun control? ou812, well well aren't you a little idle away of space. The point of the question is to find out if the similar sentiments are coming from the same basic groups of populace. If you don't want to answer the damn question then don't. Unless it's your goal surrounded by life to waste your time and other people's time. FYI-I'm against gun control and indifferent on the pit bull ban.
Best Answer:
As if you would listen. Gun control is wrong.
Against a pit bull impediment because the government just can't ban things because they have a feeling like it, granted they can be dangerous, but so can a lot of other things. Against gun control because constitutionally in that is no such thing as gun control.
We have the Second Amendment to the Constitution of The United States of America for a very good purpose. The English King George the third had attempted to disarm the American prior to the Revolution. One of the arguments that The English King George the third used was that many of the Americans be not properly trained in firearm safety and as a result there wiere too tons accidenatl shootings in the Colonies. Of course Geroge the third had an unterior motive. George the third could not have care less whether or not the Americans were having accident with guns. George the third was just trying to come up beside an excuse to take away the guns of the Americans. After the Revolution was successful and the American were drafting the exotic Constitution one of the most important issues was to put the second amendment in the Constitution so that a tyrannical commander-in-chief could never take the guns away from law abiding Americans.
I frankly think they should put a muzzle on any dog outside. I hate it when at a park a dog comes up to me and jump on me, sure it may not bite, but I dont want to take a chance. So I kick it and after owner gets pissed at me...Well keep in on a leash!
Pit bulls should NOT be allowed to own guns.
Pitt bulls are NOT born fruitless, I have raised them to be friendlier than many other breeds of dog, it is irrsponsible beast who own these kind carign and loving animals that turn them into fighting dogs, if you ask me, we should NOT only exclude for life anyone who breds even 1 fighting dog but also, ban their kinfolk while living in the same location and people should be jailed for tons years, ruin the animals life we ruin your life by giving you a felony charge, you should be required by law to hold a licence to own dogs and without one you wont get one and licences should be given after conducting tests. Guns yes they need more controls but NOT prohibition look at the failures of Britain with gun prohibition 400% + rise contained by gun crime.
nearby is a certain ethnic race that is more hostile then other races. can we ban them too?