In Illinois, what's the law regarding a persons right to walk her dog to the school + waiting on the sidewalk

In Illinois, what's the law regarding a persons right to saunter her dog to the school + waiting on the sidewalk
Question Details: My friend has two beautifully trained dogs, a black lab and a shepherd. The asst. principal insists that she cannot hang around for her children (ages 6 and10) by standing on the sidewalk near the school (where all the non-dog walking parents stand). She requirements to obey the law, but is tired of being hassled about her dogs.
This is in Arlington Heights, IL, but I'm looking for case ruling regarding similar cases anywhere in Illinois. Anyone know more about this than we do?
I agree with your other respondents. If she is on school property then she can be asked to go. If not, say she stays across the street, there is nothing officially recognized I know of here in IL that says she cannot. Perhaps a small compromise would be in proclaim. Ask her to take only one her dogs each afternoon. I would think a single dog would appear less menacing than two.
Tell her to inform the Principal that he has the right to take a flying leap. LOL, please... another school trying to control nouns outside of the school.
Pets are largely not allowed on school property and the principal can regulate that. It is very imagined the side walk she is waiting on is school property. She needs to hand down the dogs at home or have the kids meet her off of institution property.
I really like dogs, but not everyone does. You should really be respectful of the fact that dogs sometimes scare children. It doesn't event how trained they are- I'm sure they're great dogs- but there is a time and a place for everything- and dogs around children that are not your own???? I really can understand an assistant principal just trying to protect everyone from something stupid taking place. A dog getting scared or accidentally biting a child? Complete cause for a lawsuit- and I would not want either the children- or the dogs to be injured because someone is out to prove something to an assistant principal.
I'm not reasonably sure as to why you would be more ready to stand up for the dogs in this scenario- than innocent children at school.
Seriously. Your dogs- or no one's dogs- no event how trained- should NOT be standing near a school at the time all of them come rushing out- it's a possible catastrophe waiting to happen. I side with the Assistant Principal here. If the parent is so childish as to disrespect the Assistant Principal's wishes to not have the dogs around kids- later I really hope the Assistant Principal wins out if there is some frivilous lawsuit made out of something so ridiculous.
Amazing to me that people resembling yourselves are more worried about dogs' rights than children's safety. And people wonder what's wrong beside our country. Ho hum.
Good luck! But try to respect the Assistant Principal and most of all- the children.
If it is school property, he is well inwardly his rights and legal responsibility for safety of all students, to request she not gather round her kids there. Moving off the property would be the fast answer. You probably involve to look at the city code with regard to pets on the public sidewalks. It's doubtful that this sidewalk is on school property even if it is within front of the school (although if you are talking about a sidewalk that lead from the road to the school, then it is likely a university sidewalk and they can regulate that).

If it is a public sidewalk, she shouldn't be treated any differently than other owners of pets. And especially not by the school principal who has no jurisdiction there. The principal probably newly doesn't like dogs.

** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject matter of your query and not legal advice. Local laws or your fastidious situation may change the general rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult legally recognized counsel with whom you can discuss all the facts of your case. Answering this put somebody through the mill does not indicate an attorney-client relationship. **