How are Anti-i.n.c.e.s.t laws justified?
Assuming there were a serious risk of mutation or defect (despite recent scientific evidence to the contrary) then what if they are to use contraceptives? If 'its just gross' then why not simply not watch them have sex? But are invasive laws against personal and private behavior justified?
Are you sure there are laws against adult relatives having incest? I think you are misinformed.
go f888 your mother, now did that sound right to you?
Probably to protect children from parental molestation.
In Georgia, we used to have sodomy laws. The ignorant and uninformed protested that the laws were anti-homosexual. The legislative history of the laws shows that they were enacted to protect prisoners.
I would imagine that there is a similar justification for incest laws.
I believe it's for medical reasons if they were to have children, there would be a greater likelihood of genetic defects manifesting (two defective recessive genes would show up whereas otherwise normally dominant gene would overrule it). And everyone knows there's no way to force people to use contraceptives, otherwise... nevermind, I'll refrain from jokes. Plus it's not reliable
Answer:
It has obviously proved to cause insanity and retardation in the offspring..
no law is gonna prevent you from banging your sister if that is what you want to do. if you in jail you ain't banging your momma. but bubba gonna run one in ya
Related Questions:
- I was rear-ended and need help on what to do legally.?
- Can my employer do this?
- Is it illegal for an Attorney not to return my calls?
- Do you believe that the use of sexual sternness surrounded by wartime is tantamount to genocide? If so, why?
- How old do you have to be to legally own a weapon in California?
