Your views on abortion?


Tell me what you think, I personally believe that a woman should not abort, and that adoption is the best way to progress...
Best Answer:
Abortion is murder no thing what the reason is.
If society didn't treat women so badly for so long and try to control their reproduction then it woudn't be an issue to make abortion Illegal. The certainty that pro lifers are also generally against birth control makes it seem approaching their real issue is controlling women, not "saving babies". Also even pro-life people treat a fetus as smaller number than human. 1) They will "name recycle" if they have a misscarriage. (use the same designation for their next child) 2) They will not tell you "I have three kids and one that died" if they hold a misscarriage 3) They will not call the coronor if they have a misscarriage. Even pro-lifers know the fetus has a different moral standing.
I instinctively think abortion is wrong but I would never judge someone who did it-since I am not God and have no right to style guru people. I had an ultrasound in my 9th week of pregnancy and could see a child with little arm and leg buds. He jumped using his little legs. He was definately alive at that point.
I'm pro choice and I believe if you want to have a baby, hold it. If you want to have an abortion, have one. And if you want to give the kid up for adoption and do so freely, you are a pretty special person.
I love these idiots who say "Pro-lifers are against birth control." That is pure B#LLSH*T. The Catholic Church is against birth control, as well as a very few, greatly small Protestant sects. The vast majority of pro-lifers are very PRO birth control and own NO religious restrictions regarding the prevention of conception. Am I a mother? Yes. I have one daughter who turned 27 last week. I also have 2 first-trimester miscarriages. It was much to early to know whether these were boys or girls. Do I relay people this when they ask how many children I have? Of course not. A miscarriage is a DEATH. It's the loss of a child. It's emotionally scratchy. People don't want to hear about the babies you lost. And so what if people recycle names? George Foreman have named all of his sons "George Jr.". There's no law against it. It also is no care on anyone's views of a fetus. If you want a son who is named after you, or your dad, or your grandfather, and you have 6 infant sons who die during pregnancy, at birth, or during infancy, why wouldn't you verbs to give that treasured family name to respectively little boy, in the hopes that THIS is the one who will grow to adulthood with the identify? My views on abortion. If a mother is going to die if the pregnancy continues, then the mother and the father and the doctor get to produce the decision to save the mother only or the kid only. NO ONE else has any right to be a part of that edict and no one has the right to criticize the decision or its outcome. These abortions be legal even before Roe v. Wade and would continue to be permissible if Roe v. Wade were ever overturned. Rape or incest. I don't know a lot of women who were raped by strangers, but two of them did seize pregnant and both kept their babies. They both said it was the best decision they ever made. I don't know that I could make that same ruling, and I accept that there are many women who couldn't. Although my nouns is for a woman to give the child up for adoption, I would never dream of forcing that decision on a woman who has already be traumatized by rape. Using abortion as birth control, simply because a woman doesn't want a baby - no, sorry, you get no sympathy from me. Between birth control pills, estrogen rings for the cervix, Depo injections, implantable hormones, IUDs, diaphragms, contraceptive creams/gels/foams/films, cervical caps, cervical sponges, and condoms, nearby is absolutely no excuse for a woman who gets pregnant "accidentally." It's true that no method of birth control, even when used correctly and used 100% of the time, is 100% effective. But using TWO methods - the pill and a condom, or a condom and a diaphragm next to contraceptive cream - is pretty danged close to 100%. Now if one method fails (condom breaks, diaphragm slips, pills don't work because someone didn't take it), there's a second method in place for backup. Anyone who is sexually moving knows that sex causes babies. And they know they're taking the risk of creating a baby even next to birth control. So once those clothes come off, that man and that woman have implicitly given their consent to accept the outcome of their behaviour - which could very well be a baby. If you really cannot obverse the prospect of becoming a parent, then maybe you need to rethink the desirability of being sexually intimate with someone. And thanks, but within more than 30 years I've been pregnant 3 times. NONE of them were failures of birth control. All 3 be the result of what's known as "user failure" - diaphragms don't work when you leave them in the dresser drawer. They also don't work when you've gain or lost a great deal of weight and haven't been fitted next to a new one yet. After the second miscarriage, I told my husband that I really didn't want to go through that again and made him an appointment to receive snipped. Abortion is the cheap and lazy way out of a situation that no one have to be in. The number of women who have abortions after a rape is negligible, compared to the 50 million abortions that own been performed in the US since Roe v. Wade. The majority of abortions are for purposes of birth control. I believe sexually influential people should be more responsible BEFORE they have sex, use their brains and make better choices BEFORE in that is a pregnancy to contend with. That's what being a grown-up is all roughly.
I'm pro-choice. It's a woman's right to choose whether or not to preserve a bunch of cells in her body. And adoption is not a viable solution because the mother then have to suffer for 9 months and the child will probably never be adopted and just move between foster homes.
Its the woman's decision what she wants to do near her body.
I believe different people have different beliefs....and you'll never enjoy a law that appeases everyone. Don't want an abortion ?..don't get one,... but don't judge others and try to dictate their choices contained by life. Simple as that...
I believe that taking an innocent life at any point after conception is wrong. There are other alternatives.
I think that they should be able to do whatever they want. The management should do something to prevent unwanted pregnancies though (like for teens that don't want their parents to know, I mean, it's easier to get pot&alcohol than the pill) And before someone get an abortion they should have to know what it does and how it will affect you and what it will do to the baby.
I was conceived outside of wedlock, and my parents did the right item. They're still married after 40+ years, and my sister and I live happy, productive lives. This absolutely leads me to the Pro-Life side of the issue...
Pro choice
Pro-Choice. if you want to have a babe-in-arms, then it's going to come into the world with loving arms and a nice environment for it to grow up in. if you didn't want a kid and you be forced into having one, there's always going to be that whole factor of child rough up where the parent tells the kid i didn't want you anyway! and all that crap and what if the home isn't finiancially stable enough for a child? or they're just not good parents? i would never want a kid to be born if they be to grow up in poverty and not even able to be raised surrounded by a healthy enviornment