why is a court hierarchy importnat to our legal system?



Best Answer:
The court hierachy is important to our legal system because it allows plaintiffs and defendants further avenues to pursue their case if they believe that in attendance has been a legal wrong. Lower courts such as the Magistrates court or the Court of Petty Sessions are bound by the superior courts, such as the Supreme Court or High Court when making their decisions, unless they can distinguish the facts of the case before them from the precedent satchel. To put it mildly, there would have been some serious injustices over time if in attendance was only one court. It also allows States to have different courts for their adjectives jurasdictions and laws, and also gives people the oppourtunity to help yourself to their cases to the High Court for a binding decision, if it gets that far.
Because courts, especially the lower ones, screw up regularly and someone have to be able to fix it. Additionally, higher courts have to contract out responsibility to numerous lower courts in order to handle skin loads, and the higher courts, being the delegating authorities, are only there to review what their delegates are doing. ********** Edit: In response to the post below, 1. The lower courts aren't bound by all of the courts above them. They are just bound by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court above them, and if we're talking about state courts they're also bound by constitutional decisions made by the US Supreme Court, surrounded by addition to the state supreme courts and courts of appeals. 2. The hierarchy doesn't allow various jurisdiction to have courts for their own laws. The simultaneous operation of several hierarchies does that. 3. Technically speaking, the hierarchy isn't set up so that the complex courts can make the laws. The US Constitution and most state constitutions are set up so that jurisdiction's Supreme Court is in charge of every ruling, and is given the freedom to create and delegate authority to lower courts. Thus, the precedent-setting court exists before the lower courts do. You're putting the cart earlier the horse. 4. All court decisions are binding, regardless of where the court falls on the hierarchy. They're a moment ago only binding on the parties to the case if they're made by a court below the Court of Appeals. People don't "thieve their cases to the High Court for a binding decision" unless the courts below messed up.