Is the death penalty justified for some convicted murderers?


If yes...then why?
Best Answer:
I don't think so. What aspiration is it supposed to accomplish? It is not a deterrent, it doesn't keep us any more safe than life surrounded by prison and doesn't save the government money. I think surrounded by most cases, it's used as an act of revenge, which is a really scary thing. Revenge also doesn't accomplish anything and can never swarm a place of emptiness like forgiveness, but that is a firm thing to accomplish. I hope that if something were to happen to me, that I wouldn't aim revenge in the death penalty, but I'm sure I would want reprisal much like other victims. I think that is a extraordinarily good reason why it shouldn't be an option
In my evaluation, yes.
Some people think so, others don't. inneedofhelp; There is NEVER 100% proof.
Yes, it is justified for all convicted murderers, and anyone convicted for an armed robbery, or if using a gun to threaten the life of anyone, also pedophiles, and other criminals convicted of existence in prison. The death penalty is newly that, a penalty for serious crimes. Life in prison is cruel and unusual punishment, so the death cost must be used.
Yes.
It's justified for adjectives first degree murderers, it should also be implemented in pedophile cases.
Old testament- Yes New Testament- No Joe's testament- The golden rule... Eye for an eye
Nope. The death penalty should be abolished.
Yes.
i believe if nearby is 100% proof that that person committed the crime then yes they should be given the death cost, why should a murderer be ablt to live when there victim cant, and most of all, why should we compensate to give them 3 square meals, a bed, heating, sky t.v, and adjectives the other things they get, when some families cant afford these luxuries
Yes. Especially in the cases of murderers of little innocent children. Why should our tax dollars, $50,000 a year pay for them to own health and dental coverage and 3 meals a day? We enjoy law abiding citizens who don't even have that.
The disappearance penalty is justified for the majority of murders and all child pedophiles.Although,I believe that a cold blooded slaughterer has a better chance at being rehabilitated later a pervert.Anyone who would hurt a child is a waste of flesh and tax payers money(If they get prison).I would put them adjectives down like rabid dogs.People talk about human rights,consent to me say that if you take the rights from someone (especially a child)then you have no business trying to claim your rights.Just my evaluation.
I don't dream up the death penalty is justified for ANYONE
When you look at the death cost system in action, you realize ithe only purpose served is revenge, it is seriously (and intrinsically) flawed within application and that there is a serious and continuing risk of executing innocent people. And, it costs much more than life contained by prison. Sources below. 130 people wrongfully convicted people were sentenced to disappearance and were fortunate to be released, eventually. DNA, available in less than 10% of adjectives homicides, can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people. If someone is convicted and later found innocent you can release him from prison, but not from the grave. The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reliable study shows the death penalty deters others. Homicide rates are higher within states and regions that have it than in those that don’t. Life without parole, on accounts in 48 states, also prevents reoffending. It means what it says, and spending 23 of 24 hours a light of day locked in a tiny cell is not a picnic. Life without parole costs less than the loss penalty. The death penalty is much more expensive than vivacity in prison, mostly because of the upfront costs of legal process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people. (upfront = pre trial and trial level) The release penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to folks with money. When is the last time a wealthy character was on death row, let alone executed? Families of murder victims are not unanimous in the region of the death penalty. However, even families who enjoy supported the death penalty in principal hold testified that the drawn-out death penalty process is raw for them and that life without parole is an appropriate alternative. Problems with speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent ancestors released from death row had already served over a decade. Speed up the process and we will execute innocent people. Sources: Death Penalty Information Center, www.deathpenaltyinfo.org, for stats on executions, reports on costs, deterrence studies, links to FBI crime stats and links to nouns (at state legislatures) of victims' family members. FBI http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_04.html The Innocence Project, www.innocenceproject.org http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/COcosttestimony.pdf page 3 and 4 on why the death cost is so expensive http://www.njadp.org/forms/signon-survivor.html, www.mvfhr.org and www.mvfr.org for statements of victims’ families
Hell yes! and thats where on earth they're going!
I believe 1st degree murders and child molesters should get the release penalty. And to those that are still hanging on to the dream that it isn't a deterrent, please explain why the prisons are so overpopulated with gruesome criminals now. With the ease of them getting off murder charges over technicalities, and those convicted spending a decade or smaller quantity, there are no deterrents. Some people are mean ample that a few years in prison is worth killing someone. If they had to frontage losing their life over it, they might actually think twice almost it. Until people start having to face solid consequences for their actions again, things will stay the same.
I think it's justified for ALL convicted murderers.
I feel that if the creature was found guilty and convicted with the death cost, then they need to enforce that conviction. They have be put to trial, found guilty and sentenced. Yes, they have the rights to appeal, but if DNA doesn't show otherwise they need to follow through with the sentence. On a more personal memo: This is why we have so many in prisons and jail overflowing now, as well as on the streets. The law are too lenient now and people who commit crimes know the prospect of the actual sentence being enforced to the fullest extent of the law is so slim that they see no harm surrounded by committing the crime.