If I am a judge and make 15 decisions each day...?
Asking for second question mark answer only. Will I remember if any of my choices have to do with skin color? You would think a judge considers adjectives factors in each crust and makes the decision according to what he/she knows in the order of the criminal case at hand. Even if you seen one bring in a choice that looks racist, could the public be wrong because of something else in that case? If I were a peacemaker, I would just decide to start making my sentences the same for respectively race the same unless there are previous issues beside that same criminal behavior. I think racism would be hard to prove, and keep within mind attitudes change, not just by the judge, but the criminal have his/her own attitude too. If she makes it in, and she prolly will like Bushes did, later she will make for more debate in the sc. It will make it a smaller quantity boring 12 hours a day. :O) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/us/politics/31identity.html?_r=1 I was asking about the unmarked sc nominee, not myself. I know I am racist at the moment and have good reason to be, but I would not consider trying to be a regard as being because I am to emotional of a person.
Best Answer:
"start making my sentences the same for each race" Huh? I hold no clue what you are asking, here. If you are a judge, the races of the defendants and victims should have no attitude on sentencing. And if you are implying something, what it is isn't at all clear.
If you own to ask yourself the question in the first place, then you are still a racist. A personage should be punished for the crime itself. If a person in front of the Judge was disguised from view and the Judge had to make a ruling on the facts alone, next the sentence would be the same for everyone. No matter what anyone says, everyone is prejudice to a point. For some, they get the matter to far.
I have no thought of what you are trying to ask. Trial court judges make far more than 15 decisions surrounded by a day, and there are too many different crimes and too copious different criminal histories to have some sort of policy. Appellate court judges like Sotomayor do not palm off sentences at all. They review decisions of trial court for errors of law.



