Should we bring back Capitol Punishment in the UK?

With CSI's and long LONG court attles, being proven innocent/guilty is 99% these days, where as past there were a lo of innocent people one hung etc. Therefore the question of 'Should we bring back Capitol punishment in the UK?' requirements to be asked. Also what type of punishment do you think it should be for E.G, hanging, Guillotine etc.
There are certain issues like funds punishment that never stop being debated. Hence, it's pointless to keep rehashing them.

However, after a recent trip to Dubai, I am within favor of something else!

In Dubai, there is 0% theft, because the penalty is have a hand chopped off. You have no notion how relaxing it was to be able to go to the coast, just leave everything on the towel, and go swimming. No one have to stay behind and guard the wallets or other valuables. We began to realize that we be much more calm and relaxed because we didn't have to be on our guard all the time.

Now, while I'm not within favor of chopping off hands, we should bring back punishment that humiliates or cause discomfort to the culprit. How many smash and grabs would there be if you grew up seeing thieve with their heads and arms in "the stocks" (like vertebrae in Pilgrim days). Crooks, thieves, and people who achievement out violently would think not just twice, but long and complex before committing crimes.

Remember that smug little American punk who vandalized cars in Singapore in the order of ten years ago? There was a huge reaction to it, and once people started to digit out he was guilty and trying to scam the system, they were all for a few lashes of the beat. How many kids would deface buildings with graffiti or knock down mailboxes if they'd draw from paddled or whipped because of it?
Yes Not until we can spell it.
(capital)
A life for a natural life that is my moto I have worked with some of the rabble of the earth and know that some will certainly be out on the streets looking "for fun" when their sentences hold been completed (probably early).
As a father, brother, husband and ordinary working bloke, this scares the ***t out of me when I know they are not rehabilitated and that at hand will certainly be other victims.
People say that capital punishment didn't work, I read aloud maybe not, but those caught, convicted and hung did not leave any more victims other than those convicted of.
If nearby is doubt, then stick them away for life meaning existence until proof is found one way or another.
Pierrepoint stated that hanging was the most painless, the most restructured and the quickest method (he could finish it within 20 seconds of entering the condemned cell).
Like many things, it will not stop these crimes, but if you know that you will hang up if you do something, it may put the brakes on some.
Lastly, approx lb30,000 per year is the cost of keeping one single lifer in the comfort that they have become used to (better conditions than many regulation abiding people). One person for 10 years is lb300,000 and there are hundreds. I would sooner use that money to ensure pensioners can use another bar on their electric fire short going hungry!!
Capital punishment is a quick and blessed method out for the culprit. Yes, if the execution is humane. I watched a really interesting show where a journalist go on a quest to find a painless method of execution &discovered that you could kill someone with G-Force (or something of the like) and it would be painless.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7183...
^Check this out.

-It's difficult to decide. After reading some of the other answers, I guess theres a fair balance between yes and no. Executing an innocent person is probably the biggest argument against it, but it would free space contained by the full-to-bursting prisons.
NO - it's a disgusting display of human sadism. If they bring it spinal column, be prepared for revolution. no two wrongs DO NOT make a right. think of all the wrongful convictions made every hours of daylight, innocent people cold die with this system
No, butchery someone is still killing someone even if they have done something awful. Prison for life instead. I am fairly happy to pay for the upkeep rather than assets punishment. 99%? Nonsense. Have you seen the conviction rates for rape, compared with the number of rapes reported to the police? It's simple common sense that some guilty empire are getting away with things. It's therefore safe to right to be heard that Britain's judicial system is nowhere near 99% 'accurate'. I'd be happy to assume from that, that innocent people one convicted for crimes they didn't commit is not a concept that's been consigned to history.
Capital punishment implys a perfect, flawless judicial system. For a state to risk executing even one innocent person is the stuff of nightmares.
You live in a fantasy world if you cogitate that 99% of people are rightly convicted/released. Some FIFTY percent of people on death row contained by the US are later released having been wrongly convicted.

If 99% of culture are correctly dealt with, why are there such low conviction rates for rape etc? And explicitly a crime where the attacker conveniently leaves a lot of DNA behind. A murderer may confer on next to nothing.
I do not believe that capital punishment should be brought back in the UK. If a being is wrongly executed, the wrong can never be put right. However expensive it may be, long prison sentences are in my view the only proper gauge in cases of premeditated murder. No we shouldn't.
Yes and then maybe just perchance these stupid people will think before they commit doesn`t matter what crime they choose. The thing with this country is you serve about 3 years for bloodshed a person. That is not justice and they laugh within the face of the law. They might not laugh so unyielding when the rope is being put round their neck. No - there is no proof it act as a deterrent and also the chance of killing an innocent person is intolerable.
of course we should, and I'm sure some of the people on here truism otherwise would change their tune if one of these monsters in prison affected their family, what we have to understand is some of these people of late arnt going to change, multiple repeat offenders, of rapes murders, 3 strikes and your out, 3 serious jail-able offences and your times up, why should we be paying lb6000 pounds per week (for respectively inmate) when we could put that money elsewhere, people these days do not fear lock away, its easy time. if they knew their actions have serious consequences I'm sure they would be more reluctant to commit these crimes, and for those of you that still dont agree, then answer me this, if we dont bringback the death penalty, what the hell else are we supposed to do? Hell yeah !! a Lack of respect have descended on our fine and glorious country over the last 10 years
YES YES YES! Especially for the murderers of children! That would put Bush and Blair first surrounded by line for hanging!

Socerbu - so he's innocent is he? What about Iraq! Guess those relatives don't count to some huh?
A better idea would be to ask the bod what they wanted a time in jail with no remission or injection. Most after a few years will whip the easy way out. Because of the system we have surrounded by this country of huge bollocks being dropped with 1 in 10 prisoners self innocent it is highly unlikely it will ever be re-introduced. The bods in goverment know the police are crap at getting the right bod. As far as being inhuman to exercute someone I would assume being banged up for 23 hours a day surrounded by a small smelly box for the rest of your natch more inhumane. Capital punishment should be brought back, definitely!! A life for a energy! Too many murderers are wandering the streets after serving a few years being pampered contained by jail, bleating on about their" 'uman rights"! What about the rights of the poor sods who be slaughtered! It wouldn't be so bad if, as in the USA, life expected life. In this country it's a joke. The method of capital punishment should fit the approach in which the victim was kill, the more painful, the better!
absolutely the criminals that are willing to execute people just to do it need to be given the departure penalty. some people think that most types of the loss penalty are cruel and unusual punishment but they need to look at what those receiving it did to their victims who did nought to them.

oh and tammy bush didn't kill anyone
YES! Yes!
Capital, no didn't work then, won't work immediately.


wouldn't it make us as bad as them.

there is no such point as a painless execution as the people associated with it can testify, i think the better entry for people who have no chance of rehabilition is to lock them away far from contact near anyone, let them rot in jail.
yes.firing squad.