Why is it that animals can get Euthanasia if they're suffering but humans cant???

I dont understand why???
Its quite unfair??
Thank you.
Hello - try to focus on good times - the people that perfectionism for you, you family & bf
Call a friend in the party

You approaching poetry - have a look at this

Philil Larkin
They f*ck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you near the faults they had
And add some extra, of late for you.

But they were f*cked up in their turn
By fools in old-style hat and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another's throats.

Man hand on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don't enjoy any kids yourself
I have asked myself the same question. If you allow an animal to suffer you are prosecuted, so if somebody who is terminally under the weather wants to die then aren't the Doctors allowing them to suffer by not helping them?. Therefore should Doctors be prosecuted for allowing the suffering to take place?. animals are property humans aren't anymore, but if you want to execute yourself no one can really stop you.
The animals do not choose to die. Their owners make that choice.
Humans cannot choose for another to die, that is to say murder. They can. It happens all the time. It just have to be kept on the down-low. When they start showing it on TV (like Kevorkian did) people freak out.
Because animals can't understand things like their kidneys are failing and they aren't supposed to bite stitches after an operation. Animals are far less fit of taking care of themselves when they get in discouraging shape than humans are. It really is quite awful to see an animal that would otherwise be euthanised have to endure its vivacity. The big difference is that an animal can't say " Hey, I'm a old and sick please kill me!"

You don't call for government approval to commit suicide. Please don't call it Euthanasia, these word games irritate sometimes.
the answer is very clear.

Pray on it for a while.
Are animals capable of *choosing* euthanasia? There is where it starts to take complicated. its the human condition
I agree, I watch someone die of cancer and beg anyone to please give her more medicine so she would only just go to sleep. It seems a little ironic that everyone is so worried roughly speaking people on death row being kill humanly, however someone suffering from a debilitating, horrible, fatal disease has to suffer until the completion.
They can if they know a "Compassionate" doctor. would you want to be the one to do it?
In the United States, animals are considered property. In other words, they can be owned. Since they are property, the owner has certain property rights, including the right to euthanize. Humans are not considered property and are not owned by anyone. They cannot be bought, sold or traded. Therefore, except God, no person has any rights to euthanize any person, even themselves. The with the sole purpose exception is capital punishment through the legal system as a form of criminal justice. And heaps would debate that capital punishment is not euthanasia. Its a very controversial subject. . .

I guess maybe its because human energy is valued alot more than that of an animal.

Plus theres all the legal stuff with relations too for example . . Before people wud consider euthanasia there wud have to be severe physial and mental suffering . . and it can be tough decideing if its really what the soul wants and its not just someone speaking on there behalf whom may want them out of the agency for many reasons, such as money etc etc

Lol dono if any of tht makes sense, bt i knw what i stingy!

=] xx cataya xxx